SIFTING AND WINNOWING Wisconsin Case Law.....RECENT UNPUBLISHED WIPPERFURTH v. Board of Regents Ct.App. 1996 WAGNER v. Town of Menasha Ct.App. 1996 SACULLA v. State, Medical Examining Board Ct.App. 1996 KAUKAUNA SCHOOL v. D.P.I. Ct.App. 1996 SIFTING AND WINNOWING Wisconsin Case Law......TYPICAL CITATIONS AMERICAN WORLD v. Wisc. Dells Ct.App. 1996 POLICE Association v. PSC, 555 N.W.2d 179 Ct.App. 1996 Waukesha School Board v. SDBAB, 548 N.W.2d 122 Ct.App. 1996 STATE v. HUBERT, 510 N.W.2d 799 Ct.App. 1993 NELSON BROS. v. Revenue Dept., 449 N.W.2d 328 Ct.App. 1989 NICOLET Board v. Education Assn. 348 N.W.2d 175 **[1]** 1984 KAMMES v. Local Impact Fund Board 340 N.W.2d 206 Ct.App. 1983 J.F. AHERN v. Building Commission 336 N.W.2d 679 Ct.App. 1983 NICOLET Board v. Education Assn. 337 N.W.2d 846 Ct.App. 1983 State ex rel. SMITS v. De Pere, 310 N.W.2d 607 1981 BELOIT v. State Appeal Board 309 N.W.2d 392 Ct.App. 1981 AETNA Life Insurance v. Mitchell 303 N.W.2d 639 1981 SEEBACH v. Public Service Comm. 295 N.W.2d 753 Ct.App. 1980 STATE v. ALSTON, 92 Wis.2d 893 Ct.App. 1979 WILSON v. Continental Insurance 274 N.W.2d 679 **[2]** 1979 SANITARY TRANSFER v. DNR, 270 N.W.2d 144 1978 VAN ERMEN v. H&SS Department 267 N.W.2d 17 1978 Joint School District 2 v. BOARD 266 N.W.2d 374 1978 WEAVER v. Wisc. Personnel Board 237 N.W.2d 183 1976 Joint School District 2 v. State 237 N.W.2d 739 1976 WESTRING v. JAMES 238 N.W.2d 695 1976 Joint School Board v. APPEAL Board 203 N.W.2d 1 1973 CHICAGO & N.W. Railroad v. PSC., 169 N.W.2d 65 1969 ROBERTSON Transport Co. v. PSC 159 N.W.2d 636 1968 SHADOW LAWN Schools v. Walworth 147 N.W.2d 227 1967 SCHARPING v. JOHNSON, 145 N.W.2d 691 1966 HIXON v. Public Service Commission 146 N.W.2d 577 1966 IRON RGS. Dist. v. BAYFIELD CSC. 142 N.W.2d 227 1966 OLSON v. ROTHWELL, 137 N.W.2d 86 1965 **[1]** Board ignoring testimony presented was ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS. This arbitrary action was "result of an unconsidered ... choice of conduct" and NOT a result of "WINNOWING AND SIFTING" process. **[2]** "Whatever may be the limitations which trammel inquiry elsewhere we encourage that continual and fearless SIFTING AND WINNOWING BY WHICH ALONE THE TRUTH CAN BE FOUND." Bold Emphasis added. SEE ALSO: United States v. GLOVER, 731 F.2d 41 (D.C. Cir. 1984) MONTROSE Chemical v. Train, 491 F.2d 63 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
GLOBAL JUSTICE SEARCH HOME PAGE COMMENTS? SEND MAIL